How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Bethany Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC
421 Ocala Drive, Nashville, TN 37211 (opens Google Maps) · Davidson County · (615) 834-4214· 180 certified beds · avg 171 residents/day · certified since Oct 28, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 11, 2025
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 23, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Oct 23, 2019 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Oct 23, 2019 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 12, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 11, 2018 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 11, 2018 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 3, 2018 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 23, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jul 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2019
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2019 | 2 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTennessee averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.80
Tennessee average: 3.62
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.26
Tennessee average: 0.57
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.29
Tennessee average: 3.15
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.80 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Tennessee; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in Tennessee; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.29 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 5% in Tennessee; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 2% in Tennessee; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 62.1 | 48.9 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Tennessee; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 72.0 | 43.2 | 42.9 | bottom 9% in Tennessee; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.33, weekend 2.85.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.49 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bethany Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethany Ventures TN LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/01/2017 |
| Zucker, Yossie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Arch, Laura | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2026 |
| Arch, Laura | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2026 |
| Bethany Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Carerite Centers LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Eme, Ijagha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Eme, Ijagha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| MD Friedman Family 2017 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2023 |
| MN Consulting Ny LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Neal Einhorn Family 2017 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2023 |
| Osteen, Dwight | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2022 |
| Osteen, Dwight | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2022 |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
| Zucker, Yossie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2017 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Creekside Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Madison, TN · overall 4/5
- Gallatin Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Gallatin, TN · overall 4/5
- Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Nashville, TN · overall 3/5
- Lebanon Center for Rehabilitation and Healing, LLC — Lebanon, TN · overall 5/5
- Manchester Center for Rehabilitation and Healing L — Manchester, TN · overall 4/5
- Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL — Nashville, TN · overall 2/5
- Quality Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC — Lebanon, TN · overall 1/5
- Trevecca Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC — Nashville, TN · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Tennessee midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 62% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioch TN Opco, LLC | 3.9 mi | Antioch, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Somerfield at the Heritage | 5.2 mi | Brentwood, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Woodcrest at Blakeford | 6.5 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Trevecca Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC | 6.7 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL | 6.8 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 6.9 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Hickory Woods | 7.3 mi | Antioch, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Health Center at Richland Place | 7.7 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Nashville | 9.0 mi | Nashville, TN | —/5 | ||
| Heartland | 9.6 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| West Meade Place | 10.0 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| NHC Place at Cool Springs | 10.1 mi | Franklin, TN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Davidson, TN — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Creekside Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Madison, TN · overall 4/5
- Eaton Creek Post Acute — Nashville, TN · overall —/5SFF
- Life Care Center of Old Hickory Village — Old Hickory, TN · overall 3/5
- NHC Place at the Trace — Nashville, TN · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445159.