Michigan ›Belmont

The Oaks at Belmont

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

6081 W River Drive, Belmont, MI 49306 (opens Google Maps) · Kent County · (906) 670-4451· 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jun 23, 2021 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 8, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 11, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.10
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 11, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Aug 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

  2. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 7 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 11, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Oct 24, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 1).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202420F
202511G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.10
Michigan average: 4.32
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.11
Michigan average: 0.84
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.62
Michigan average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.104.323.95top 49% in Michigan; top 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.110.840.69top 19% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.623.793.50top 47% in Michigan; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.880.490.48top 8% in Michigan; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.644.145.8top 4% in Michigan; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.239.242.9top 18% in Michigan; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.37, RN 1.19, weekend 3.86.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Oaks at Belmont. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Griffin-American Healthcare Reit III, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/01/2015
Griffin-American Healthcare Reit IV Holdings, LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/01/2015
Northstar Healthcare Income INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/01/2015
Northstar Healthcare Income Operating Partnership LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/01/2015
Trilogy Holdings Nt-Hci, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/01/2015
Barber, RobinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2018
Barney, LeighIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2001
Bryant, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2016
Corbin, KathyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2011
Davis, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/21/2017
Fightmaster, LisaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Mehaffey, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2021
Prosky, DannyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Streiff, MathieuIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Stuever, JanaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2021
Trilogy Management Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Williamson, BradleyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2014

All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 23% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 31 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Michigan Veteran Homes at Grand Rapids4.2 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5
Medilodge of Grand Rapids5.6 miGrand Rapids, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard5.6 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center -5.9 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat6.0 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5
Porter Hills Health Center7.3 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5
Mary Free Bed Sub-Acute Rehabilitation7.4 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★☆4/5
Edison Christian Health Center7.6 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★4/5
St Ann's Home7.7 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5
Valley View Care Center7.9 miGrand Rapids, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Clark Retirement Community8.1 miGrand Rapids, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Valley Health Center8.5 miGrand Rapids, MI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Kent, MI — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Belmont →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235727.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details