How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat
1226 Cedar Street NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (opens Google Maps) · Kent County · (616) 486-3001· 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Jan 3, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COREWELL HEALTH (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.7★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 15, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Feb 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Feb 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.05
Michigan average: 4.32
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.98
Michigan average: 0.84
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.44
Michigan average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.05 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 14% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 28% in Michigan; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.44 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 35% in Michigan; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.8 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 45% in Michigan; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.5 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 41% in Michigan; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.58, RN 0.89, weekend 4.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.58 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beg, Simin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Boettcher, Iris | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Boettcher, Iris | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bragg, Talawnda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/26/2021 |
| Buckley, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Corewell Health | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2025 |
| Cox, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Doornbos, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Ferrell-Robinson, Lynnette | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Freese Decker, Christina | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Freese Decker, Christina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Hofman, Ronald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Marlow, Tamila | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Marlow, Tamila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Pakkala, Karen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2023 |
| Pakkala, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2023 |
| Pakkala, Karen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2023 |
| Pink, Bill | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Port, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2020 |
| Sells, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Corewell Health — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Corewell Health Greenville Hospital Rehabilitation — Greenville, MI · overall 5/5
- Corewell Health Reed City Hospital Rehabilitation — Reed City, MI · overall 5/5
- Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 5/5
- Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - — Stevensville, MI · overall 3/5
- Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 46% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 26 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 30 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard | 0.6 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of Grand Rapids | 1.0 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mary Free Bed Sub-Acute Rehabilitation | 1.6 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - | 1.9 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Clark Retirement Community | 2.3 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Michigan Veteran Homes at Grand Rapids | 2.7 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Porter Hills Health Center | 3.4 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edison Christian Health Center | 3.7 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Ann's Home | 4.1 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Valley Health Center | 4.2 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Covenant Village of the Great Lakes | 4.6 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Holland Home - Raybrook Manor | 4.7 mi | Grand Rapids, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Kent, MI — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 5/5
- Harbor Post Acute Center — Wyoming, MI · overall 3/5
- Holland Home Breton Rehabilitation & Living Centre — Grand Rapids, MI · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235075.