100 Hollinshead Spring Road, Skillman, NJ 08558 (opens Google Maps) · Somerset County · (609) 759-3654· 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Nov 17, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, pattern · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 25, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 9, 2021 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 23, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2025 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jun 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 9, 2021 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 9, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Sep 9, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Sep 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 2 | H ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $133,000.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2025 | Fine | $133,000 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.62 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 14% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.62 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 2% in New Jersey; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.29 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 13% in New Jersey; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.15 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 3% in New Jersey; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 28% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.55, RN 1.60, weekend 4.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stonebridge at Montgomery Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2014 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2025 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2006 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2009 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2025 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/25/2013 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2003 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2025 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Springpoint Senior Living — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Park Place LLC | 3.9 mi | Monmouth Junction, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC | 4.0 mi | Princeton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 5.3 mi | Plainsboro, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Hillsborough | 6.1 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Foothill Acres Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 6.7 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 8.9 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury | 9.6 mi | Cranbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Somerset Woods Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 9.6 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital | 9.9 mi | Lawrenceville, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Clover Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente | 10.0 mi | Lawrenceville, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows at Lawrence | 10.1 mi | Lawrenceville, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Parker at Somerset, INC | 10.2 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Somerset, NJ — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315486.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details