Three David Brainerd Drive, Monroe Township, NJ 08831 (opens Google Maps) · Middlesex County · (732) 521-6407· 120 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 2, 2026 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 6, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 20, 2023 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $237,451.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | Fine | $182,266 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | Fine | $55,185 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.51 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 17% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.96 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 14% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.16 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 16% in New Jersey; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.73 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.0 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 35% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 39.1 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.29, RN 0.92, weekend 3.95.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.29 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Village Point. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2017 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2025 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/27/2018 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2018 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2018 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2018 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Springpoint Senior Living — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cranbury Center | 3.2 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at East Brunswick | 4.2 mi | East Brunswick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury | 4.4 mi | Cranbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T | 4.6 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Excel Care at Manalapan | 5.3 mi | Manalapan, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Old Bridge | 6.1 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Reformed Church Home | 6.2 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge | 6.6 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Old Bridge, LLC | 7.0 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Meadow Lakes | 7.5 mi | East Windsor, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Park Place LLC | 7.7 mi | Monmouth Junction, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC | 9.3 mi | Princeton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Middlesex, NJ — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315269.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details