New Jersey ›East Windsor

Meadow Lakes

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

300 Meadow Lakes, East Windsor, NJ 08520 (opens Google Maps) · Mercer County · (609) 448-4100· 60 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 18, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640

  2. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. F-0865

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. · F-0922
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2025110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.57
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.23
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.10
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.573.883.95top 15% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.230.670.69top 7% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.103.533.50top 17% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.880.500.48top 9% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.139.745.8bottom 41% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.937.742.9bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.63, RN 1.25, weekend 4.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.63 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Meadow Lakes. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Argondizza, AnthonyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Argondizza, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Kopec, MarybethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/05/1996
Kopec, MarybethIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2025
Kopec, MarybethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/05/1996
Midgett, GarrettIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2009
Midgett, GarrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/05/1996
Midgett, GarrettIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2008
Springpoint Senior Living INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/05/1996
Springpoint Senior Living INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2008

All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Springpoint Senior Living — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
  • "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
  • "How does your quality improvement program work, and can you share a recent example of a problem you found and fixed?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 48 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T3.1 miMonroe Township, NJ★★★★☆3/5
The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury4.0 miCranbury, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Cranbury Center4.3 miMonroe Township, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.5 miHamilton, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Village Point7.5 miMonroe Township, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC7.8 miPlainsboro, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Preferred Care at Hamilton7.9 miHamilton Square, NJ★★★★★4/5
Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC8.7 miPrinceton, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Complete Care at Park Place LLC8.9 miMonmouth Junction, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Accela Post Acute Care at Hamilton8.9 miHamilton, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Mercerville LLC9.2 miHamilton Township, NJ★★★★★4/5
Excel Care at Manalapan9.7 miManalapan, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Mercer, NJ — 16 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in East Windsor →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315022.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details