How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
17475 S Dixie Hwy, Miami, FL 33157 (opens Google Maps) · Miami-Dade County · (305) 255-1045· 180 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since Jan 6, 2020 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VENTURA SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 9, 2023 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 9, 2023 · F-0604
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 9, 2023 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. F-0635
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · F-0635 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.26 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in Florida; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.04 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 17% in Florida; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.89 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Florida; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.80 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 15% in Florida; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 17.1 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 4% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.9 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 5% in Florida; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 1.12, weekend 3.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for South Dade Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agrp 2011 Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Deborah Philipson 2011 Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Schaffer, Daniel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Ventura Opco Holdco, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/22/2020 |
| Agrp 2011 Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Agrp 2011 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Bengio, Jacob | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Deborah Philipson 2011 Family Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Deborah Philipson 2011 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Decardenas, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2021 |
| Decardenas, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2021 |
| Paritzky, Jeremie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Philipson, Bent | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Philipson, Gabrielle | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2025 |
| Philipson, Raquel | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2025 |
| Richards Mitchell & Cross Pa | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Rodriguez, Ivan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
| Schaffer, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/07/2019 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ventura Services — 14 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 13 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLC | 0.9 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| East Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.1 mi | Cutler Bay, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center | 2.5 mi | Cutler Bay, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Annes Nursing Center, St Annes Residence INC | 3.0 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Harmony Health Center | 4.9 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Palace at Kendall Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente | 5.4 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Nspire Healthcare Kendall | 6.2 mi | Kendall, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kendall Lakes Healthcare and Rehab Center | 6.9 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Riviera Health Resort | 7.3 mi | Coral Gables, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| West Gables Health Care Center | 9.2 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Palmetto Subacute Care Center | 10.2 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Coral Gables Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 10.4 mi | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Miami-Dade, FL — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106132.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details