FloridaHobe Sound

Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthc

9555 SE Federal Hwy, Hobe Sound, FL 33455 · Martin County · 120 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1977

Part of chain: VENTURA SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide bedrooms with required basics: a window to the outside, a room at or above ground level, adequate bedding, furniture that fits the resident's needs, or enough closet space.
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 24, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100F
2024140E
2026110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.944.033.95top 44% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.110.760.69top 14% in Florida; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.543.683.50top 50% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.710.530.48top 21% in Florida; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.141.445.8bottom 43% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.046.042.9bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 1.04, weekend 3.31. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Martin Coast Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/11/2024
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Tessler Associates LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Tessler, AronIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Tessler, NaomiIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Bengio, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Benjamin, BernardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Benjamin, BernardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Paritzky, JeremieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Patel, SheerinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/11/2024
Philipson, BentIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2025
Philipson, GabrielleIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2025
Philipson, RaquelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Seabranch Health and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miStuart, FL★★★★★5/5
Solaris Healthcare Parkway8.4 miStuart, FL★★★★☆4/5
Stuart Rehabilitation and Healthcare8.5 miStuart, FL★★★★☆4/5
Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center9.7 miPalm City, FL★★★★★4/5
Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation10.3 miPalm City, FL★★★★★5/5
Jupiter Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center10.5 miJupiter, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Luxe at Jupiter Rehabilitation Center (the)14.2 miJupiter, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie15.5 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center16.1 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie16.3 miPort Saint Lucie, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hobe Sound →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105300.