FloridaNorth Bay Village

Treasure Isle Care Center

1735 N Treasure Drive, North Bay Village, FL 33141 · Miami-Dade County · 176 certified beds · avg 167 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1982

Part of chain: SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH (8 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Oct 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024150F
2025180E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.284.033.95bottom 4% in Florida; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.760.69bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.043.683.50bottom 4% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.530.48bottom 28% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)23.241.445.8top 9% in Florida; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.346.042.9top 25% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.58, weekend 3.02. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Senior Health Properties South, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/30/2000
Senior Health South Ex LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%11/20/2000
Anu Health Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Anu Health Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Brown, LucretaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2019
Brown, LucretaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2019
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2011
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Depiano, RichIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2010
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Jaffe, HowardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2012
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2025
Mullen, AnnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Omega Healthcare Investors, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2003
Richmond, PennyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Select Rehabilitation, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2016
Senior Health South Ex LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2025
Tucker, HeidiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Miami Jewish Health Systems, INC3.1 miMiami, FL★★★★☆3/5
Biscayne Health and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★★4/5
Villa Maria Nursing Center3.4 miNorth Miami, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Shoreside Health and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miMiami, FL★★★★★5/5
Pines Nursing Home3.5 miMiami, FL★★★★☆4/5
Miami Shores Nursing and Rehab Center3.9 miMiami, FL★★★★☆3/5
North Dade Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.9 miNorth Miami, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Azure Shores Rehab4.0 miMiami, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Fountain Manor Health & Rehabilitation Center4.4 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★★4/5
The Lilac at Silver Palms4.5 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★☆3/5
Pinecrest Center for Rehabilitation and Healing4.5 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★★4/5
Claridge House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.6 miNorth Miami, FL★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Bay Village →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105408.