South CarolinaBeaufort

Resorts at Beaufort

11 Todd Drive, Beaufort, SC 29901 · Beaufort County · 170 certified beds · avg 127 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1975

Part of chain: THE ROSENBERG FAMILY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,868
Fines, last 3 years
4.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 2, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 9, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
2025111G ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,868.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 16, 2025Fine$10,868

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.094.083.95top 40% in South Carolina; top 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.670.69top 44% in South Carolina; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.533.553.50top 41% in South Carolina; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.410.48top 40% in South Carolina; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.745.945.8bottom 7% in South Carolina; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.142.142.9bottom 39% in South Carolina; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.59, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Resorts at Beaufort 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2023
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, ZviIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
11 Todd LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
11 Todd LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
11 Todd LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Az 22 TrOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Az 22 TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Castor, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Castor, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Ferguson, Sandra LIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Ferguson, Sandra LIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Resorts at Beaufort 2 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Rosenberg, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sprenger Health Care of Port Royal1.6 miPort Royal, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Preston Health Center12.3 miHilton Head Island, SC★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Hilton Head12.7 miHilton Head Island, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sprenger Healthcare of Bluffton17.0 miBluffton, SC★★★★★5/5
Broad Creek Care Center17.0 miHilton Head Island, SC★★★★★4/5
NHC Healthcare - Bluffton17.9 miOkatie, SC★★★★☆4/5
Fraser Health Center18.3 miHilton Head Island, SC★★★★☆3/5
Ridgeland Nursing Center INC19.3 miRidgeland, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Beaufort →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425067.