11 Todd Drive, Beaufort, SC 29901 (opens Google Maps) · Beaufort County · (843) 524-8911· 170 certified beds · avg 127 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ROSENBERG FAMILY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,868.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | Fine | $10,868 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.09 | 4.08 | 3.95 | top 40% in South Carolina; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 44% in South Carolina; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.53 | 3.55 | 3.50 | top 41% in South Carolina; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 40% in South Carolina; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 64.7 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 7% in South Carolina; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.1 | 42.1 | 42.9 | bottom 39% in South Carolina; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.59, weekend 3.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Resorts at Beaufort. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resorts at Beaufort 2 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| 11 Todd LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| 11 Todd LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| 11 Todd LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Az 22 Tr | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Az 22 Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Castor, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Castor, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2025 |
| Ferguson, Sandra L | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Ferguson, Sandra L | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2025 |
| Resorts at Beaufort 2 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Individual | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Rosenberg, Moshe | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Rosenberg Family — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sprenger Health Care of Port Royal | 1.6 mi | Port Royal, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Preston Health Center | 12.3 mi | Hilton Head Island, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Hilton Head | 12.7 mi | Hilton Head Island, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Sprenger Healthcare of Bluffton | 17.0 mi | Bluffton, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Broad Creek Care Center | 17.0 mi | Hilton Head Island, SC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare - Bluffton | 17.9 mi | Okatie, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fraser Health Center | 18.3 mi | Hilton Head Island, SC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ridgeland Nursing Center INC | 19.3 mi | Ridgeland, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425067.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details