PennsylvaniaStroudsburg

Stroudsburg Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitationllc

4227 Manor Drive, Stroudsburg, PA 18360 · Monroe County · 174 certified beds · avg 124 residents/day · certified since Apr 9, 1980

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: THE ROSENBERG FAMILY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 5, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 18, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care or assistance for a resident who uses a prosthesis, such as an artificial limb.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 5, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
Jul 25, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024120E
2025121G ▲
2026151G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.973.943.95top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.640.800.69bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.563.583.50top 40% in Pennsylvania; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.560.48bottom 49% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.444.545.8bottom 27% in Pennsylvania; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.539.942.9bottom 41% in Pennsylvania; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.60, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Rdy TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2025
Rosenberg, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2025
Stroudsburg Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitaion 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2025
4227 Manor 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
4227 Manor 2 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
4227 Manor LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
4227 Manor LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Az 22 TrOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Gilphilin, DevertonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Gilphilin, DevertonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Lewis, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Lewis, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rdy TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, AvrahamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, MosheIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Rosenberg, MosheIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Whitestone Care Center3.5 miStroudsburg, PA★★★★☆3/5
Sapphire Care and Rehab Center6.6 miEast Stroudsburg, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Slate Belt Health & Rehabilitation Center7.4 miBangor, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Brookmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center7.6 miEffort, PA★★★★☆3/5
Clover Rest Home10.2 miColumbia, NJ★★★★★5/5
Moravian Hall Square Health and Wellness Center14.2 miNazareth, PA★★★★★4/5
Northampton County-Gracedale14.8 miNazareth, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Lopatcong Center17.8 miPhillipsburg, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Brakeley Park18.1 miPhillipsburg, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
New Eastwood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center18.3 miEaston, PA★★★★★4/5
Easton Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center18.3 miEaston, PA★★★★★4/5
Gardens for Memory Care at Easton, the18.6 miEaston, PA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stroudsburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395491.