How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
825 South 94th Street, Chandler, AZ 85224 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (480) 361-6636· 70 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Oct 24, 2011 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SANTE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.88 | 3.97 | 3.95 | top 16% in Arizona; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 44% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.21 | 3.50 | 3.50 | top 18% in Arizona; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 37% in Arizona; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 45.2 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 43.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.84, RN 0.60, weekend 4.17.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sante of Chandler. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clark, Jere | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Hansen, Charles | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Munch Tooke, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Munch, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Santana Falls LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Short, Sterling | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| SP Chandler LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| SP Op Chandler LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Sterling & Jacqueline Holdings,llc | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2022 |
| Tooke, Arthur | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 09/19/2011 |
| Gudino, Lori | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Schaefer, Jacob | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sante — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archstone Care Center | 0.0 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 0.4 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Desert Cove Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| River Park Post Acute | 3.6 mi | Chandler, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tempe Post Acute | 6.0 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Ahwatukee Post Acute | 6.4 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Friendship Village of Tempe | 7.0 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wellsprings of Gilbert | 7.5 mi | Gilbert, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Center at Val Vista, LLC | 7.5 mi | Gilbert, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mirabella at Asu | 9.6 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sandridge Post Acute | 10.2 mi | Mesa, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation | 10.6 mi | Mesa, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035283.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details