TennesseeKingsport

Holston Rehabilitation and Care Center

3641 Memorial Blvd, Kingsport, TN 37664 · Sullivan County · 204 certified beds · avg 149 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1992

Part of chain: VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT (25 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,868
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 17, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 17, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030D
202310D
2024100F
202591G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,868.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 17, 2025Fine$10,868

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.213.623.95bottom 29% in Tennessee; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.570.69bottom 21% in Tennessee; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.153.50bottom 37% in Tennessee; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.390.48bottom 3% in Tennessee; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)68.148.945.8bottom 6% in Tennessee; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)56.343.242.9bottom 26% in Tennessee; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.44, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CH FH Holding LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
CW FH Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
FH SNF Operations Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2022
M Melb Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
M Melb Opco TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Ms FH Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
S Melb Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
S Melb Opco TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
SE SNF Associates LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
SE SNF Associates TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
SE SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
SE SNF Holdings TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
SS FH Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
FH Opco Manager LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
FH Opco Manager LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Goodman, MenuchaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Goodman, MenuchaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Goodman, MenuchaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Herzka, YisroelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2026
Kelly, JohnathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
NHC Healthcare, Kingsport1.4 miKingsport, TN★★★★★4/5
Wexford House1.5 miKingsport, TN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Orchardview Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center2.7 miKingsport, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
Greystone Health Care Center6.2 miBlountville, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Asbury Place Kingsport6.4 miKingsport, TN★★★★★4/5
Nova Health and Rehab6.6 miWeber City, VA★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Gray9.6 miGray, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Waters of Bristol a Rehabilitation and Nursing11.9 miBlountville, TN★★★★☆5/5
Church Hill Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center12.7 miChurch Hill, TN—/5SFF
NHC Healthcare, Johnson City13.5 miJohnson City, TN★★★★★5/5
Princeton Transitional Care & Assisted Living14.6 miJohnson City, TN★★★★★5/5
The Waters of Johnson City, LLC14.8 miJohnson City, TN★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kingsport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445295.