LouisianaMarksville

Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

426 North Washington Street, Marksville, LA 71351 · Avoyelles County · 64 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1997

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES (13 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$21,752
Fines, last 3 years
3.33
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 27, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 24, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 24, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202470D
2025102J ▲
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $21,752.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 24, 2025Fine$9,110
May 29, 2025Fine$12,642

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.334.043.95bottom 18% in Louisiana; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.320.69top 17% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.843.453.50bottom 19% in Louisiana; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.200.48bottom 38% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.747.645.8bottom 35% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.441.642.9bottom 43% in Louisiana; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.41, weekend 2.97. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Abington Family Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2023
Abington, LeonardIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
B & J Limited PartnershipOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%11/01/2017
Broussard, ScottIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
Calvin H Jones EstateOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%08/11/2025
Davis, JohnIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/02/2022
Davis, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
Davis, ThomasIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
Jhs-Snf LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
Management Group Eleven LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%04/01/2022
Revocable Trust of Roy Bush Bridges and Judy Kaye Winn BridgesOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
SHM Colonial LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%04/01/2022
SRB Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
The Vernice C Wright Irrevocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/01/2022
Abington, LeonardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Broussard, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Broussard, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Davis, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Davis, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Davis, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Valley View Health Care Facility1.2 miMarksville, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Riviere de Soleil Community Care Center2.0 miMansura, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Hessmer Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.8 miHessmer, LA★★★★☆5/5
Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center11.5 miCenter Point, LA★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Bayou Vista Nursing and Rehab Center13.3 miBunkie, LA★★★☆☆4/5
Avoyelles Manor Nursing Home15.1 miDupont, LA★★★★☆5/5
Bayou Chateau Nursing Center18.0 miSimmesport, LA★★☆☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marksville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195445.