426 North Washington Street, Marksville, LA 71351 (opens Google Maps) · Avoyelles County · (318) 253-4554· 64 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES (13 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 27, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 24, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. F-0567
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| May 29, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $21,752.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | Fine | $9,110 |
| May 29, 2025 | Fine | $12,642 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.33 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 18% in Louisiana; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 17% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.84 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 19% in Louisiana; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 38% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.7 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 41.6 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Louisiana; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.41, weekend 2.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abington Family Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2023 |
| Abington, Leonard | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| B & J Limited Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 11/01/2017 |
| Broussard, Scott | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Calvin H Jones Estate | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 08/11/2025 |
| Davis, John | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/02/2022 |
| Davis, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Davis, Thomas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Jhs-Snf LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Management Group Eleven LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 04/01/2022 |
| Revocable Trust of Roy Bush Bridges and Judy Kaye Winn Bridges | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| SHM Colonial LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/01/2022 |
| SRB Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| The Vernice C Wright Irrevocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Abington, Leonard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Broussard, Scott | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Broussard, Scott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Davis, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Davis, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Davis, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Rightcare Health Services — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valley View Health Care Facility | 1.2 mi | Marksville, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riviere de Soleil Community Care Center | 2.0 mi | Mansura, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hessmer Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Hessmer, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 11.5 mi | Center Point, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Bayou Vista Nursing and Rehab Center | 13.3 mi | Bunkie, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avoyelles Manor Nursing Home | 15.1 mi | Dupont, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Bayou Chateau Nursing Center | 18.0 mi | Simmesport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195445.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details