Indiana ›Mooresville

Meadow Lakes

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

200 Meadow Lake Dr, Mooresville, IN 46158 (opens Google Maps) · Morgan County · (317) 834-1791· 137 certified beds · avg 123 residents/day · certified since Mar 22, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES (90 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 27, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jan 10, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 10, 2024 · F-0744 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.

Why it matters: Poor dementia care can lead to distress, unsafe wandering, or unnecessary sedating medication.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint F-0726

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
May 27, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jun 5, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jun 5, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jan 10, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202451G ▲
202540D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.19
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.53
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.79
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.193.423.95bottom 43% in Indiana; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.620.69bottom 43% in Indiana; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.793.013.50bottom 43% in Indiana; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.470.48top 49% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.245.945.8top 39% in Indiana; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.540.442.9top 44% in Indiana; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.58, weekend 3.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Meadow Lakes. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2009
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2026
Andres, AnthonyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2021
Andres, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2026
Babcock, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2020
Caine, VirginiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/10/1994
Dice, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Dice, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Drummer, CarlIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Hanify, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Harris, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/22/2003
Horn, BrendaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Lazard, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2021
Mantravadi, GeetaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2021
McCallum, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2024
McCallum, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2026
Newkirk, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2021
Payne, MonicaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Van Camp, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Van Camp, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023

All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain American Senior Communities — 90 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 89 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
  • "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
  • "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 55 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Springs of Mooresville, the1.1 miMooresville, IN★★★★★5/5
Miller's Merry Manor1.6 miMooresville, IN★★★★★5/5
Cumberland Trace Health & Living Community4.2 miPlainfield, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Plainfield Health Care Center5.8 miPlainfield, IN★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Chalet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.2 miIndianapolis, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Washington Healthcare Center8.1 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★☆3/5
Countryside Meadows8.9 miAvon, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Majestic Care of Avon9.9 miAvon, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Greenwood Meadows10.6 miGreenwood, IN★★★★★4/5
Wellbrooke of Avon10.7 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★★4/5
Brooke Knoll Village10.7 miAvon, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Avon Health & Rehabilitation Center10.7 miAvon, IN★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Morgan, IN — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Mooresville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155751.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details