Park Terrace Village

Name: Park Terrace Village
Address: 25 S BOEHNE CAMP RD, Evansville, IN, 47712, US
Telephone: 8124237468

25 S Boehne Camp Rd, Evansville, IN 47712 · Vanderburgh County · 96 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Mar 17, 1989

Part of chain: AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES (90 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.23

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Nov 18, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 10, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 10, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 3, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 21, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 23, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 23, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Sep 23, 2022	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 6).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	10	E
2023	2	D
2024	15	E
2025	7	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Indiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.23	3.42	3.95	bottom 48% in Indiana; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.48	0.62	0.69	bottom 33% in Indiana; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.89	3.01	3.50	top 47% in Indiana; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.38	0.47	0.48	bottom 44% in Indiana; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	60.3	45.9	45.8	bottom 13% in Indiana; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	57.1	40.4	42.9	bottom 21% in Indiana; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.56, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
American Senior Communities LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
American Senior Communities LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/15/2026
Babcock, Paul	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/30/2020
Caine, Virginia	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/10/1994
Carr, William	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2026
Carr, William	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/15/2026
Debes, Amber	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2024
Dice, Mark	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023
Dice, Mark	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023
Drummer, Carl	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2017
Hanify, Thomas	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022
Harris, Lisa	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/22/2003
Hayes, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/09/2019
Hayes, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/15/2026
Horn, Brenda	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Lazard, Robert	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/29/2021
Mantravadi, Geeta	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/21/2021
Payne, Monica	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	08/09/2021
Van Camp, Steven	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023
Van Camp, Steven	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
West River Health Campus	1.8 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
River Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation	1.9 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Terrace at Solarbron the	2.5 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Parkview Care Center	3.2 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care Center	3.9 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★☆☆	3/5
Envive of River City	3.9 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Columbia Healthcare Center	4.0 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care Center	4.5 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★★	5/5
Heritage Center	4.5 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
North Park Nursing Center	4.7 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
Bethel Manor	5.3 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Aperion Care Lincoln	5.7 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Evansville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155328.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Park Terrace Village

25 S Boehne Camp Rd, Evansville, IN 47712 · 8124237468

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 155328 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)