Oregon ›Tigard

Avamere Rehabilitation of King City

16485 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR 97224 · Washington County · 148 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1976

Part of chain: AVAMERE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
2024120F
202590E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.645.423.95bottom 13% in Oregon; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.780.69top 32% in Oregon; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.134.853.50bottom 14% in Oregon; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.480.48top 34% in Oregon; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.847.445.8top 28% in Oregon; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.051.642.9top 40% in Oregon; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.75, weekend 3.80. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ari Operations, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2006
Ariso LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2006
Avamere Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2006
Miller, KarlIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2000
Adams, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Adams, NancyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Avamere Health Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Avamere Health Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Avamere Skilled Advisors LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Avamere Skilled Advisors LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Cavallo, GlenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Cavallo, GlenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Dana, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Dana, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Davis, JulieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Doepker, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2023
Doepker, AndreaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2023
Feakin, CodyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Feakin, CodyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Feakin, CodyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Tigard Rehabilitation and Care1.3 miTigard, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab2.2 miTualatin, OR★★★★★4/5
The Pearl at Kruse Way4.1 miLake Oswego, OR★★★★☆4/5
Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia5.3 miBeaverton, OR★★★★★4/5
West Hills Health & Rehabilitation5.5 miPortland, OR★★★★☆3/5
Maryville6.1 miBeaverton, OR★★★★☆3/5
Marquis Vermont Hills6.4 miPortland, OR★★★★★5/5
Robison Jewish Health Center6.6 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care6.7 miPortland, OR★★★★★4/5
Avamere Crestview of Portland6.9 miPortland, OR★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tigard →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385132.