Woodside Post Acute
301 Ridings Avenue, Molalla, OR 97038 · Clackamas County · 92 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Sep 20, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 18, 2026 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 24, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Jul 12, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 14, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Nov 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (28)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 17, 2026 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint |
| Mar 18, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide specialized rehabilitation services — like physical, occupational, or speech therapy — by qualified staff when a doctor ordered them for a resident. · from a complaint |
| Jul 24, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · from a complaint |
| Oct 21, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 12 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
5 fines totaling $115,888.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | Fine | $55,607 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | Fine | $16,985 |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Fine | $15,961 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | Fine | $5,294 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | Fine | $22,041 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.51 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 37% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.78 | 0.69 | bottom 15% in Oregon; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.07 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 28% in Oregon; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 27% in Oregon; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.6 | 47.4 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Oregon; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 87.5 | 51.6 | 42.9 | bottom 5% in Oregon; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.72, RN 0.38, weekend 4.34. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2013 |
| Apt, Frederick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Collins, Amanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2024 |
| May, Luke | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| May, Luke | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2025 |
| Mitchell, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2024 |
| Molalla 301 Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Morris, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Morris, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2025 |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Truist Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
- "How quickly do residents start therapy after a doctor orders it, and who provides it?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Hope Village | 8.4 mi | Canby, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation | 11.8 mi | Mount Angel, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab | 12.6 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rivercrest Post Acute | 13.0 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab | 13.4 mi | Wilsonville, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 14.1 mi | Woodburn, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City | 14.1 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rose Linn Care Center | 14.4 mi | West Linn, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas | 16.1 mi | Gladstone, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab | 17.9 mi | Tualatin, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Fernwood Supportive Living at Madrona Grove | 19.2 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willamette View Health Center | 19.4 mi | Milwaukie, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385150.