New JerseyEast Hanover

Livia Health and Senior Living

1 South Ridgedale Avenue, East Hanover, NJ 07936 · Morris County · 86 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since May 14, 2020

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$24,850
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 26, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 26, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 20, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 21, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202420D
202572J ▲
202630F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $24,850.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 26, 2025Fine$24,850

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.983.883.95top 32% in New Jersey; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.670.69top 44% in New Jersey; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.743.533.50top 27% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.560.500.48top 27% in New Jersey; top 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.539.745.8top 47% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.837.742.9top 50% in New Jersey; top 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.63, RN 0.71, weekend 4.35. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Colgan, WilliamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/17/2021
Community Healthcare and Rehabilitation LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2021
Livia Health at East Hanover LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/12/2017
Livia Health at East Hanover LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/12/2017
Molfetta, RichIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/17/2021
Colgan, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2021
Colgan, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2021
Molfetta, RichIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2021
Molfetta, RichIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Careone at Hanover Township1.5 miWhippany, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Troy Hills Center2.4 miParsippany, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Cheshire Home2.7 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★4/5
Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.8 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★5/5
Careone at Parsippany3.4 miParsippany Troy Hill, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare3.7 miMadison, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Livingston3.7 miLivingston, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Inglemoor Rehabilitation and Care Center4.5 miLivingston, NJ★★★★★5/5
Morristown Post Acute Rehab and Nursing Center4.8 miMorristown, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Madison Avenue4.8 miMorristown, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Lutheran Social Ministries Cranes Mill5.3 miWest Caldwell, NJ★★★★★4/5
Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center5.4 miChatham, NJ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in East Hanover →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315529.