Aviata at Central Park

Name: Aviata at Central Park
Address: 702 S KINGS AVE, Brandon, FL, 33511, US
Telephone: 8136511818

702 S Kings Ave, Brandon, FL 33511 · Hillsborough County · 120 certified beds · avg 117 residents/day · certified since Feb 25, 1991

Part of chain: AVIATA HEALTH GROUP (50 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$7,456

Fines, last 3 years

3.17

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Nov 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 25, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint
Oct 13, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 13, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 31, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Jan 31, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2020	8	E
2021	8	E
2023	5	D
2024	7	E
2025	6	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $7,456.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Aug 28, 2023	Fine	$3,728
Aug 28, 2023	Fine	$3,728

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Florida avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.17	4.03	3.95	bottom 2% in Florida; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.47	0.76	0.69	bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.97	3.68	3.50	bottom 2% in Florida; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.42	0.53	0.48	bottom 46% in Florida; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	46.5	41.4	45.8	bottom 37% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	42.9	46.0	42.9	top 43% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.24, RN 0.48, weekend 3.03. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
702 S Kings Ave Opco Holdco LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
702 S Kings Ave Opco Parent LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Aspire Mgt LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Dagan, Amitai	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/20/2025
Freund, Nochum	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Freund, Nochum	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Goldberger, Abraham	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/20/2025
Goldberger, Faigy	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Herskowitz, Eliezer	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Herskowitz, Yaakov	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Oliver, Desteny	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Oliver, Desteny	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Travitsky, Aaron	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Veve, Vanessa	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Veve, Vanessa	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"How do you make sure every shift actually follows each resident's care plan?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Hawthorne Center for Rehabilitation and Healing of	0.5 mi	Brandon, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Aviata at Oakfield	0.8 mi	Brandon, FL	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Victoria Crossing Rehabilitation Center	1.2 mi	Brandon, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	9.7 mi	Tampa, FL	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Whispering Oaks	9.9 mi	Tampa, FL	★★★☆☆	2/5
Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing	9.9 mi	Tampa, FL	★★★☆☆	2/5
Community Convalescent Center	10.9 mi	Plant City, FL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Canterbury Towers INC	12.1 mi	Tampa, FL	★★★★★	4/5
Excel Care Center	12.2 mi	Tampa, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Fairway Oaks Center	12.3 mi	Tampa, FL	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Blue Palms Health and Rehabilitation Center at Fle	12.3 mi	Tampa, FL	★★★☆☆	2/5
Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center of Tampa	12.5 mi	Tampa, FL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brandon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105718.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Aviata at Central Park

702 S Kings Ave, Brandon, FL 33511 · 8136511818

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $7,456

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
☐ "How do you make sure every shift actually follows each resident's care plan?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 105718 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)