Maryland ›Arnold

Future Care Chesapeake

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

305 College Parkway, Arnold, MD 21012 (opens Google Maps) · Anne Arundel County · (410) 647-0015· 152 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Jan 11, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 4, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.77
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. F-0726

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201990D
202480E
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.77
Maryland average: 3.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.93
Maryland average: 0.83
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.35
Maryland average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.773.833.95top 37% in Maryland; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.930.830.69top 23% in Maryland; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.353.433.50top 39% in Maryland; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.710.630.48top 24% in Maryland; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.440.245.8top 26% in Maryland; top 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.738.742.9top 28% in Maryland; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 1.00, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Future Care Chesapeake. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey PowersOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark PowersOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Attman, GaryIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Gilden, ShellyeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Jeffrey Attmon Trust Ua DTD 122686 Attmon Phyllis TteeOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%06/01/2009
Leonard J Attman Tr Ua Fbo Wende Attman Phyllis TteeOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Levitas, WendeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Powers, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Powers, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%12/01/2025
Powers, MarkIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Shellye Attman Gilden Tr Ua DTD Attman Phyllis TteeOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey PowersOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark PowersOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Attman, GaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009

Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Future Care/Lifebridge Health — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
  • "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 41 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Severna Park LLC4.2 miSeverna Park, MD★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.7 miCrownsville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek6.1 miAnnapolis, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Annapolis6.1 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★★4/5
Ginger Cove6.8 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★☆5/5
Future Care Annapolis7.0 miAnnapolis, MD—/5
South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center8.3 miEdgewater, MD★★★★☆3/5
Marley Neck Rehabilitation and Wellness Center8.4 miGlen Burnie, MD★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington9.0 miGlen Burnie, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel9.5 miGambrills, MD★★★★★4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Burnie9.8 miGlen Burnie, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton10.0 miCrofton, MD★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Anne Arundel, MD — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Arnold →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215186.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details