MarylandAnnapolis

Complete Care at Annapolis

900 Van Buren Street, Annapolis, MD 21403 · Anne Arundel County · 97 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1976

Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Mar 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Nov 14, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019140D
202480D
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.413.833.95bottom 44% in Maryland; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.670.830.69bottom 48% in Maryland; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.923.433.50bottom 28% in Maryland; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.630.48bottom 42% in Maryland; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.940.245.8bottom 37% in Maryland; top 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.238.742.9bottom 32% in Maryland; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.71, weekend 3.11. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Des Capital LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
JRK Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Klugman, JacobIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
PC MD5 Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2023
PC MD5 Topco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2023
SMS 2021 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2023
Stein, ShalomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Sternbuch, DanielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Adesse Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Adesse MD Peace MD5 Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Adesse MD5 Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Annapolis MD Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Bharaj, NarenderIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Bharaj, NarenderIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Cox, VickieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Cox, VickieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
HC Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Mansfield, MelissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Mansfield, MelissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
MD 4 Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek0.7 miAnnapolis, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Ginger Cove3.7 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★☆5/5
South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center4.1 miEdgewater, MD★★★★☆3/5
Future Care Annapolis5.3 miAnnapolis, MD—/5
Future Care Chesapeake6.1 miArnold, MD★★★★★5/5
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center7.7 miCrownsville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Severna Park LLC9.4 miSeverna Park, MD★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton10.9 miCrofton, MD★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel11.6 miGambrills, MD★★★★★4/5
Larkin Chase Center13.7 miBowie, MD★★★★★4/5
Marley Neck Rehabilitation and Wellness Center14.2 miGlen Burnie, MD★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington14.3 miGlen Burnie, MD★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Annapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215005.