Future Care Sandtown-Winchester

Name: Future Care Sandtown-Winchester
Address: 1000 NORTH GILMORE STREET, Baltimore, MD, 21217, US
Telephone: 4106692750

1000 North Gilmore Street, Baltimore, MD 21217 · Baltimore City County · 148 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Jan 26, 1995

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.65

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Feb 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Feb 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 18, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 18, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 18, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 18, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 18, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Feb 18, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 18, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 18, 2020	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 17, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 21).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2018	7	D
2020	8	E
2025	22	E
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.65	3.83	3.95	top 42% in Maryland; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.66	0.83	0.69	bottom 46% in Maryland; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.18	3.43	3.50	bottom 48% in Maryland; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.44	0.63	0.48	bottom 35% in Maryland; top 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	14.8	40.2	45.8	top 1% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	14.3	38.7	42.9	top 6% in Maryland; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.65, weekend 3.12. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman Family LTD Prtnshp	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	03/29/1994
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Powers, Jeffrey	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Powers, Mark	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	10%	12/01/2025
The Jeffrey Attman 1994 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	16%	03/29/1994
The Shellye Attman Gilden 1994 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	16%	03/29/1994
The Wende Levitas 1994 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	16%	03/29/1994
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman Family LTD Prtnshp	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Gary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Gary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Gary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/29/1994
Attman, Leonard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Future Care Charles Village	1.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Future Care Homewood	1.1 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Fayette Health and Rehabilitation Center	1.4 mi	Baltimore, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center	1.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor	1.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Maryland Baptist Aged Home	1.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Keswick Multi-Care Center	1.9 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place	2.1 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Roland Park Place	2.2 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Roland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	2/5
Northwest Healthcare Center	2.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark	3.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baltimore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215271.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Future Care Sandtown-Winchester

1000 North Gilmore Street, Baltimore, MD 21217 · 4106692750

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215271 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)