How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Future Care Sandtown-Winchester
1000 North Gilmore Street, Baltimore, MD 21217 (opens Google Maps) · Baltimore City County · (410) 669-2750· 148 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Jan 26, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 6, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.65
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 38 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint F-0806
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
View all 38 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Oct 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 18, 2020 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Aug 17, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 21).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2020
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 22
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2020 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 22 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.65
Maryland average: 3.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.66
Maryland average: 0.83
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.18
Maryland average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.65 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 42% in Maryland; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Maryland; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.18 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 48% in Maryland; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Maryland; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 14.8 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 1% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 6% in Maryland; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.65, weekend 3.12.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Future Care Sandtown-Winchester. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Attman Family LTD Prtnshp | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 03/29/1994 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Powers, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Powers, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 12/01/2025 |
| The Jeffrey Attman 1994 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 03/29/1994 |
| The Shellye Attman Gilden 1994 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 03/29/1994 |
| The Wende Levitas 1994 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 03/29/1994 |
| Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Attman Family LTD Prtnshp | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/1994 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Future Care/Lifebridge Health — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Good Samaritan Nursing Home Operator, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
- Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
- Atlee Hill Health and Rehab Center — Westminster, MD · overall 2/5
- Courtland, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 1/5abuse
- Future Care Annapolis — Annapolis, MD · overall —/5
- Future Care Canton Harbor — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
- Future Care Capital Region — Landover, MD · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How are residents' personal funds handled here, and what records can families review?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 15% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 33 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 87 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future Care Charles Village | 1.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Future Care Homewood | 1.1 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fayette Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center | 1.6 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor | 1.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maryland Baptist Aged Home | 1.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Keswick Multi-Care Center | 1.9 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place | 2.1 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roland Park Place | 2.2 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Roland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Northwest Healthcare Center | 2.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark | 3.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Baltimore City, MD — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Good Samaritan Nursing Home Operator, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
- Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
- St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215271.