MarylandCrofton

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton

2131 Davidsonville Road, Crofton, MD 21114 · Anne Arundel County · 180 certified beds · avg 156 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1980

Part of chain: AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.35
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Mar 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 18).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
2024130D
2025200F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.353.833.95bottom 37% in Maryland; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.830.69bottom 7% in Maryland; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.983.433.50bottom 34% in Maryland; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.630.48bottom 10% in Maryland; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.740.245.8bottom 46% in Maryland; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.038.742.9top 11% in Maryland; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 0.51, weekend 3.63. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
A&r Stern Family CC Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest77%08/01/2021
Stern, AryehIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
2131 Davidsonville Propco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
2131 Davidsonville Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
A&r Stern Family CC Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Accurate Staffing LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Accurate Staffing LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Brand Sonnenschine LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Brand Sonnenschine LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Meisels, MorrisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2021
Mugera, CharlesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2017
Mugera, CharlesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2017
Schwartz, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Schwartz, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Stern, AryehIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Stern, RochelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Wheat, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2010
Wheat, MaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel2.1 miGambrills, MD★★★★★4/5
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.3 miCrownsville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Larkin Chase Center5.4 miBowie, MD★★★★★4/5
Future Care Annapolis5.8 miAnnapolis, MD—/5
Ginger Cove7.5 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★☆5/5
Complete Care at Severna Park LLC7.8 miSeverna Park, MD★★★☆☆2/5abuse
South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center8.3 miEdgewater, MD★★★★☆3/5
Villa Rosa Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC9.0 miMitchellville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington9.4 miGlen Burnie, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Future Care Chesapeake10.0 miArnold, MD★★★★★5/5
Doctors Community Rehabilitation and Patient Care10.0 miLanham, MD★★★☆☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek10.2 miAnnapolis, MD★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Crofton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215120.