Future Care Homewood
2700 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 · Baltimore City County · 141 certified beds · avg 139 residents/day · certified since May 7, 1993
Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (48)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 15, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| May 21, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint |
| May 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (15 → 14).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 15 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 18 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 15 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.33 | 3.83 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in Maryland; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.06 | 0.83 | 0.69 | top 18% in Maryland; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.92 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 27% in Maryland; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 10% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.8 | 40.2 | 45.8 | bottom 38% in Maryland; top 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.8 | 38.7 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in Maryland; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 1.38, weekend 3.80. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Powers, Jeffrey | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Powers, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Powers, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 12/01/2025 |
| The Leonard J Attman 1995 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 10/25/1995 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/25/1995 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Future Care Health and Management Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Future Care Health and Management Corporation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2025 |
| Futurecare Health & Management of Homewood INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Futurecare Health & Management of Homewood INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2025 |
| Powers, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Powers, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Spadaro, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2013 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future Care Charles Village | 0.3 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place | 1.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Future Care Sandtown-Winchester | 1.1 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Keswick Multi-Care Center | 1.3 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center | 2.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor | 2.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Roland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 2.1 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fayette Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Roland Park Place | 3.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Northwest Healthcare Center | 3.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Maryland Baptist Aged Home | 3.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Future Care Cold Spring | 3.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215249.