Future Care Pineview

Name: Future Care Pineview
Address: 9106 PINEVIEW LANE, Clinton, MD, 20735, US
Telephone: 4108804353

9106 Pineview Lane, Clinton, MD 20735 · Prince Georges County · 180 certified beds · avg 165 residents/day · certified since May 28, 1999

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

2.92

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 22, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 26, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 26, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Oct 26, 2022	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Oct 26, 2022	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 16, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 16, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (19 → 10).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	3	E
2022	19	E
2025	11	E
2026	2	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.92	3.83	3.95	bottom 4% in Maryland; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.81	0.83	0.69	top 33% in Maryland; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.60	3.43	3.50	bottom 4% in Maryland; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.91	0.63	0.48	top 15% in Maryland; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	39.2	40.2	45.8	top 46% in Maryland; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	40.8	38.7	42.9	bottom 40% in Maryland; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 1.15, weekend 3.68. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Jeffrey Attmon Trust Ua DTD 122686 Attmon Phyllis Ttee	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	8%	06/01/2009
Powers, Jeffrey	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Powers, Mark	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	12%	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman, Gary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Attman, Gary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Attman, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Attman, Leonard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Clinton Nursing Home Limited Partnership	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Finglass, Brian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Future Care Health & Management of Pineview INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009
Future Care Health & Management of Pineview INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/19/2025
Future Care Health and Management Corporation	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/19/2025
Gilden, Shellye	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Hidden Waters Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	0.2 mi	Clinton, MD	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bradford Oaks	1.2 mi	Clinton, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Forestville Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	5.8 mi	Forestville, MD	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Ft Washington Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	6.1 mi	Fort Washington, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Serenity Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC	7.1 mi	Washington, DC	★★★★☆	3/5
Harborside Health & Rehabilitation	7.9 mi	Washington, DC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Capitol City Rehab and Healthcare Center	7.9 mi	Washington, DC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Largo Nursing and Rehabiliation Center	9.2 mi	Glenarden, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
George Washington Health & Rehabilitation	9.4 mi	Alexandria, VA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Deanwood Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	9.5 mi	Washington, DC	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Clinton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215328.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Future Care Pineview

9106 Pineview Lane, Clinton, MD 20735 · 4108804353

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215328 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)