MarylandArnold

Future Care Chesapeake

305 College Parkway, Arnold, MD 21012 · Anne Arundel County · 152 certified beds · avg 142 residents/day · certified since Jan 11, 1989

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.77
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 22, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201990D
202480E
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.773.833.95top 37% in Maryland; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.930.830.69top 23% in Maryland; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.353.433.50top 39% in Maryland; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.710.630.48top 24% in Maryland; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.440.245.8top 26% in Maryland; top 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.738.742.9top 28% in Maryland; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 1.00, weekend 3.64. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey PowersOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark PowersOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Attman, GaryIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Gilden, ShellyeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Jeffrey Attmon Trust Ua DTD 122686 Attmon Phyllis TteeOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%06/01/2009
Leonard J Attman Tr Ua Fbo Wende Attman Phyllis TteeOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Levitas, WendeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Powers, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Powers, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%12/01/2025
Powers, MarkIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Shellye Attman Gilden Tr Ua DTD Attman Phyllis TteeOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey PowersOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark PowersOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Attman, GaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Attman, LeonardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Severna Park LLC4.2 miSeverna Park, MD★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.7 miCrownsville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek6.1 miAnnapolis, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Annapolis6.1 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★★4/5
Ginger Cove6.8 miAnnapolis, MD★★★★☆5/5
Future Care Annapolis7.0 miAnnapolis, MD—/5
South River Rehabilitation and Wellness Center8.3 miEdgewater, MD★★★★☆3/5
Marley Neck Rehabilitation and Wellness Center8.4 miGlen Burnie, MD★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington9.0 miGlen Burnie, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Waugh Chapel9.5 miGambrills, MD★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Arnold →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215186.