MinnesotaBloomington

Friendship Village of Bloomington

8130 Highwood Drive, Bloomington, MN 55438 · Hennepin County · 66 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Jan 29, 1980

Part of chain: LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$99,500
Fines, last 3 years
4.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 2, 2024 · F-0610

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 2, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
May 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 2, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202491K ▲
202540D
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $99,500.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 2, 2024Fine$99,500

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.444.833.95bottom 34% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.251.220.69top 38% in Minnesota; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.814.273.50bottom 30% in Minnesota; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.840.690.48top 24% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.242.245.8top 35% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.038.642.9top 27% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 1.17, weekend 3.57. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lifespace Communities INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/09/2009
Bever, JenniferIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/09/2015
Blackford, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Darkey-Hrinya, JoyceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2018
Dutra, AnaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2016
Fields, VenitaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2018
Gorman, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2022
Hamm, SaraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/30/2015
Harshfield, NicholasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Jantzen, JesseIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2021
Jensen, ClausIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2023
Kresse, NikkiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/19/2021
Lifespace Communities INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2009
McDonough, AmyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2023
Pope, ErinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2022
Salamino, JeniferIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2023
Sokeye, JonathanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Spangler, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2016
Stretch, ClydeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2023
Williams, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Flagstone2.1 miEden Prairie, MN★★★★☆3/5
Aurora on France3.7 miEdina, MN★★★★☆3/5
Hopkins Restorative Care Center4.0 miHopkins, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Edenbrook of Edina4.3 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center4.5 miBloomington, MN★★★★★4/5
Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington4.5 miBloomington, MN★★★★★4/5
Chapel View Health Care Center5.3 miHopkins, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Estates at Bloomington LLC5.6 miBloomington, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Sholom Home West5.8 miSaint Louis Park, MN★★★★★4/5
Mount Olivet Careview Home6.0 miMinneapolis, MN★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bloomington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245229.