MinnesotaSaint Louis Park

Sholom Home West

3620 Phillips Parkway South, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 · Hennepin County · 139 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Jul 24, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202420D
202590E
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.164.833.95top 9% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.531.220.69top 19% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.814.273.50top 4% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.040.690.48top 14% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)18.842.245.8top 2% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)19.438.642.9top 16% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.39, RN 1.34, weekend 5.08. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Berryman, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2016
Berryman, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2016
Furman, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Horvath, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Horvath, AndreaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/27/2025
Jacobs, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Lampert, ReneeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Meiches, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Mosow, DanielIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Newbrough, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2024
Newbrough, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2024
Nirenstein, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Packer, FlorenceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pederson, JaneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Pederson, JaneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Pierotti, JeremyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Resig, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Rosen, LayneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Rutzick, SherylIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Salita, MarcIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Estates at St Louis Park LLC0.7 miSaint Louis Park, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Chapel View Health Care Center0.9 miHopkins, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Villas at the Cedars1.2 miSaint Louis Park, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Villas at St Louis Park1.8 miSaint Louis Park, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Hopkins Restorative Care Center1.9 miHopkins, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at the Park2.5 miSaint Louis Park, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at Brookview3.3 miGolden Valley, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Jones Harrison Residence3.4 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr4.4 miGolden Valley, MN★★★★★5/5
Good Samaritan Ambassador4.8 miNew Hope, MN★★★★★5/5
Aurora on France4.8 miEdina, MN★★★★☆3/5
Edenbrook of Edina4.9 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Louis Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245574.