How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1555 Rockaway Parkway, Brooklyn, NY 11236 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 927-6300· 270 certified beds · avg 263 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE SHERMAN FAMILY (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint F-0604
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.47 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 2% in New York; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 15% in New York; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.22 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 48% in New York; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.3 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 15% in New York; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 36% in New York; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.54, weekend 2.95.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Four Seasons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsel, Hindy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/16/2018 |
| Frankl, Sheryl | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/16/2018 |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/16/2018 |
| Manela, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 01/16/2018 |
| Pomerawtz, Chawawia | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/16/2018 |
| Sherman, Alexander | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 01/16/2018 |
| Sherman, Lea | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 01/16/2018 |
| Gallen, Caroline | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/1996 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Sherman Family — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 0.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care Center | 0.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Schulman and Schachne Institute for Nursing and Re | 1.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rutland Nursing Home, INC | 2.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care | 2.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential | 2.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooklyn-Queens Nursing Home | 2.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio | 2.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home | 2.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335673.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details