New YorkBrooklyn

Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care

50 Sheffield Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11207 · Kings County · 225 certified beds · avg 222 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1989

Part of chain: CENTERS HEALTH CARE (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 24, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jun 24, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jun 24, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160E
2023100F
202580D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.213.583.95bottom 38% in New York; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.680.69bottom 6% in New York; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.763.133.50bottom 35% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.480.48bottom 9% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.140.345.8top 29% in New York; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.439.842.9top 28% in New York; top 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.33, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Rozenberg, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest98%06/11/2008
Goldman, NathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hagler, DarylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2008
Hendrix, HeidiIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Horovitz, MeirIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/23/2019
Horovitz, MeirIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/23/2019
Lantzitsky, AharonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Rozenberg, KennethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Sicklick, JeffreyIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/21/2015
Younesi, PeymanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Younesi, PeymanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.5 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Schulman and Schachne Institute for Nursing and Re1.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing1.8 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home1.9 miBrooklyn, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Brooklyn-Queens Nursing Home1.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio2.0 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care Center2.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Buena Vida Rehab and Nursing Center2.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335703.