New YorkBrooklyn

Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential

170 Buffalo Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11213 · Kings County · 281 certified beds · avg 274 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: CENTERS HEALTH CARE (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$9,110
Fines, last 3 years
2.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 4, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 4, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss.
Sep 29, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Sep 29, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Sep 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 29, 2021C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202190F
2023130F
202571G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $9,110.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 4, 2025Fine$9,110

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.903.583.95bottom 19% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.680.69bottom 5% in New York; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.503.133.50bottom 15% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.480.48bottom 26% in New York; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.340.345.8top 17% in New York; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)48.339.842.9bottom 28% in New York; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.41, weekend 3.20. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Rozenberg, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest95%12/18/2015
Abramchik, AmirIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Balin, YonatanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2025
Balin, YonatanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2025
Blumenfeld, SolIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Goldman, NathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hendrix, HeidiIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Lantzitsky, AharonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Lati, ZevIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Lati, ZevIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Lerner, LeoIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio0.6 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Rutland Nursing Home, INC1.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation1.2 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★5/5
Schulman and Schachne Institute for Nursing and Re1.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care1.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Buena Vida Rehab and Nursing Center1.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.8 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing2.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335178.