How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1000 SW 16th Ave, Gainesville, FL 32601 (opens Google Maps) · Alachua County · (352) 376-2461· 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE SHERMAN FAMILY (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. F-0604
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 29, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.00 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 38% in Florida; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 12% in Florida; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.70 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 36% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in Florida; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.6 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 31% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.39, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Parklands Care Center and Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5h1 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/27/2024 |
| Berger, Stuart | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Golden Eagle Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Parklands Nursing SNF Holdco II LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Parklands Nursing SNF Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2024 |
| Parklands Nursing SNF JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/27/2024 |
| Presser, Aaron | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Sherman, Samuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Stars FL LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Stars Re Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Stern, Isaac | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Tessler, Chaim | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Tessler, Elia | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Wasserman, Alan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Wasserman, Mark | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Weinstock Family 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Weinstock, Yechiel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| Weinstock, Yosef | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2024 |
| 5h1 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 45 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 25 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Sherman Family — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Meadows Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oak Hammock at the University of Florida INC | 2.6 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gainesville Health and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Plaza Health and Rehab | 4.0 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Palm Garden of Gainesville | 4.2 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at North Florida | 5.0 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Magnolia Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.9 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Gainesville, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Williston Care Center and Rehab | 18.6 mi | Williston, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105638.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details