New YorkBrooklyn

Brooklyn-Queens Nursing Home

2749 Linden Boulevard, Brooklyn, NY 11208 · Kings County · 140 certified beds · avg 137 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$141,232
Fines, last 3 years
4.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
May 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
May 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 26, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 21, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 21, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 21, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 21, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 21, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
202360D
202490E
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $141,232, plus 2 Medicare payment denial periods.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 28, 2024Fine$141,232
Oct 28, 2024Payment Denial13 days from Jan 28, 2025
Jul 11, 2024Payment Denial28 days from Oct 11, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.163.583.95top 20% in New York; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.680.69top 49% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.783.133.50top 16% in New York; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.480.48top 42% in New York; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.640.345.8bottom 24% in New York; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.539.842.9bottom 20% in New York; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.77, RN 0.52, weekend 3.42. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Berkowitz, LeopoldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%07/09/1998
Thomas, SelmaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2016
Thomas, SelmaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2016
Younesi, PeymanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2019
Younesi, PeymanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home0.1 miBrooklyn, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation1.1 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★★4/5
Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care1.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care Center2.0 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing2.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Four Seasons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center2.7 miBrooklyn, NY★★★★☆3/5
Schulman and Schachne Institute for Nursing and Re2.9 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Jamaica Hospital Nursing Home Co INC3.2 miJamaica, NY★★★★★4/5
Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential3.3 miBrooklyn, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Dry Harbor Nursing Home3.4 miMiddle Village, NY★★★★★4/5
Brooklyn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.4 miBrooklyn, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Silvercrest3.5 miJamaica, NY★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brooklyn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335637.