The Villas at the Park
4415 West 36 1/2 Street, Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 · Hennepin County · 52 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1979
Part of chain: MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (45 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 20, 2025 · F-0688
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 24, 2024 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Nov 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (29)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
13 fines totaling $144,586.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | Fine | $76,140 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | Fine | $17,989 |
| Oct 30, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Oct 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Oct 10, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Oct 2, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.75 | 4.83 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in Minnesota; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 1.22 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.47 | 4.27 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Minnesota; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.48 | bottom 50% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.6 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 40% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.67, weekend 2.93. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 32% | 01/01/2023 |
| Jaffa, Noam | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2023 |
| Legum, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 26% | 01/01/2023 |
| Nij LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2023 |
| Spartan Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 32% | 01/01/2023 |
| Stern, William | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 26% | 01/01/2023 |
| WBS Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 26% | 01/01/2023 |
| Yazoma Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 26% | 01/01/2023 |
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Halpert, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Jaffa, Noam | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Legum, Joshua | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Monarch Healthcare Operating Xii LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Stern, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "Who helps residents who need assistance eating, and what training and supervision do those helpers get?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Harrison Residence | 0.9 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at St Louis Park | 1.8 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Villas at the Cedars | 1.8 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Estates at St Louis Park LLC | 1.9 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sholom Home West | 2.5 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Southside Care Center | 2.7 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Birchwood Care Home | 2.7 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC | 2.8 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Redeemer Health Care Center | 2.8 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Saint Louis Park →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245083.