MinnesotaMinneapolis

Redeemer Health Care Center

625 West 31st Street, Minneapolis, MN 55408 · Hennepin County · 119 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1988

Part of chain: CASSIA (16 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 2, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
2024120F
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.194.833.95top 31% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.911.220.69bottom 23% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.704.273.50top 25% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.690.48bottom 36% in Minnesota; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.842.245.8top 31% in Minnesota; top 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.338.642.9bottom 40% in Minnesota; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.34, RN 0.76, weekend 3.93. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Elim Care INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/04/1993
CassiaOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Colgan, DannyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2012
Dahl, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/1993
Kern, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2019
Leff, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2000
Nye, GeraldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2019
Peterson, RolandIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/14/2013
Tangedahl, GuyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2012
Youngquist, KathrynIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/1993

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Birchwood Care Home0.1 miMinneapolis, MN★★★★★4/5
Southside Care Center0.6 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center0.8 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Estates at Chateau LLC1.2 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Grand Avenue Rest Home1.3 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis1.7 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Jones Harrison Residence2.0 miMinneapolis, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Andrew Residence2.1 miMinneapolis, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Providence Place2.5 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC2.5 miMinneapolis, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
The Villas at the Park2.8 miSaint Louis Park, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Fairview University Trans Serv2.9 miMinneapolis, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Minneapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245520.