Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP

Name: Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP
Address: 3915 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, Golden Valley, MN, 55422, US
Telephone: 6127752835

3915 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55422 · Hennepin County · 56 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1988

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$16,355

Fines, last 3 years

7.51

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 13, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 13, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint
Apr 13, 2026	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not have policies ensuring that, if it ever closes, the administrator carries out all required steps to protect residents through the closure. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 14, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 14, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	4	0	F
2025	2	0	D
2026	6	1	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,355.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Apr 13, 2026	Fine	$16,355

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Minnesota avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	7.51	4.83	3.95	top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	2.88	1.22	0.69	top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	7.07	4.27	3.50	top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	2.56	0.69	0.48	top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	38.7	42.2	45.8	top 47% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	26.3	38.6	42.9	top 33% in Minnesota; top 23% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.24, RN 2.78, weekend 6.82. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Allina Health System	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	06/01/2013
Allina Health System	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2013
Alstad, Jennifer	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2016
Baker, Chanda	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/20/2024
Ballard, Shari	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/24/2021
Borgstrom, Marna	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2025
Church, John	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/09/2021
Estes, Melinda	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2025
Gillund, Laura	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2015
Hang, Maykao	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/24/2021
Joos, David	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2019
Joos, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2019
King, Louis	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/12/2017
Kolar, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/13/2024
Lindig, Marcia	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2015
Lindig, Marcia	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/10/2025
Lowe, Challis	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/08/2022
McGrane, Brian	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2024
Newcome, Roger	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/11/2022
O'Laughlin, Daniel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
"Is this facility financially stable, and what would happen to residents if it ever had to close?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
The Villas at Robbinsdale	0.9 mi	Robbinsdale, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr	1.2 mi	Golden Valley, MN	★★★★★	5/5
Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC	1.7 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community	1.7 mi	Robbinsdale, MN	★★☆☆☆	1/5
The Terrace at Crystal LLC	1.9 mi	Crystal, MN		—/5	SFF
The Villas at Brookview	2.5 mi	Golden Valley, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Good Samaritan Ambassador	2.7 mi	New Hope, MN	★★★★★	5/5
Catholic Eldercare on Main	3.1 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Jones Harrison Residence	3.2 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
The Villas at St Louis Park	3.4 mi	Saint Louis Park, MN	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Golden Valley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245519.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP

3915 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55422 · 6127752835

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $16,355

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 13, 2026 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
☐ "Is this facility financially stable, and what would happen to residents if it ever had to close?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 245519 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)