How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Aurora on France
6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN 55435 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (952) 848-8865· 65 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Jan 5, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 28, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
7.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 22, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 22, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 7.09
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 2.86
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 6.36
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.09 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.86 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 1% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.36 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.94 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.1 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 19% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.6 | 38.6 | 42.9 | bottom 50% in Minnesota; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.27, RN 2.53, weekend 5.63.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Aurora on France. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, Brett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/2024 |
| Anderson, Brett | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/2024 |
| Bell, Brittany | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/06/2021 |
| Bell, Brittany | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/06/2021 |
| Carlson-Weinberg, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2019 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2015 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2025 |
| Faust, Kim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2021 |
| Hereford, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Jacobson, Carolyn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2017 |
| Kvenvold, Gayle | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2024 |
| Landreville, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2024 |
| Milius, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2024 |
| Olinger, Anna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2024 |
| Olinger, Anna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
| Piper, Kenneth | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2022 |
| Piper, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2022 |
| Walker, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2022 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ebenezer Senior Living — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Ebenezer Integrated Care & Rehab — Saint Paul, MN · overall 4/5
- Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center — Burnsville, MN · overall 4/5
- Jones Harrison Residence — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Martin Luther Care Center — Bloomington, MN · overall 2/5
- Meadows on Fairview — Wyoming, MN · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 96 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edenbrook of Edina | 0.6 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount Olivet Careview Home | 2.3 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mount Olivet Home | 2.3 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Villas at Richfield | 3.4 mi | Richfield, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grand Avenue Rest Home | 3.5 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Friendship Village of Bloomington | 3.7 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hopkins Restorative Care Center | 4.1 mi | Hopkins, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Estates at Bloomington LLC | 4.2 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington | 4.3 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Villas at the Park | 4.4 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Birchwood Care Home | 4.7 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Bywood East Health Care — Minneapolis, MN · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Catholic Eldercare on Main — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Chapel View Health Care Center — Hopkins, MN · overall 4/5
- Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP — Golden Valley, MN · overall 4/5
- Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab Ctr — Golden Valley, MN · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245634.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).