Catholic Eldercare on Main

Name: Catholic Eldercare on Main
Address: 817 MAIN STREET NORTHEAST, Minneapolis, MN, 55413, US
Telephone: 6123791370

817 Main Street Northeast, Minneapolis, MN 55413 · Hennepin County · 164 certified beds · avg 147 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1987

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$24,713

Fines, last 3 years

4.67

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 18, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Dec 18, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Oct 18, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 18, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Oct 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 16, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Nov 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	9	0	E
2024	11	1	J ▲
2025	12	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $24,713.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 18, 2024	Fine	$24,713

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Minnesota avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.67	4.83	3.95	bottom 45% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.23	1.22	0.69	top 39% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.13	4.27	3.50	bottom 45% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.72	0.69	0.48	top 33% in Minnesota; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	20.0	42.2	45.8	top 4% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	15.9	38.6	42.9	top 13% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.18, RN 1.11, weekend 3.70. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Adetola, Adekola	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Barta, Marie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2019
Barta, Marie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2019
Baumberger, Gregory	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/17/2017
Baumberger, Gregory	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/17/2017
Baumberger, Gregory	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/17/2017
Baumberger, Gregory	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/17/2017
Fitzmorris, Chris	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2017
Fitzmorris, Chris	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2017
Mielke, John	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/06/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Andrew Residence	2.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis	2.0 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC	2.4 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
The Estates at Chateau LLC	2.4 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Fairview University Trans Serv	2.5 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★★★★	5/5
Bywood East Health Care	2.5 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Southside Care Center	3.1 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes TRP	3.1 mi	Golden Valley, MN	★★★★☆	2/5
The Villas at Robbinsdale	3.4 mi	Robbinsdale, MN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center	3.5 mi	Minneapolis, MN	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Minneapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245439.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Catholic Eldercare on Main

817 Main Street Northeast, Minneapolis, MN 55413 · 6123791370

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $24,713

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Oct 18, 2024 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 245439 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)