MinnesotaSaint Paul

Ebenezer Integrated Care & Rehab

45 West 10th Street, Saint Paul, MN 55102 · Ramsey County · 62 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1991

Part of chain: EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$31,360
Fines, last 3 years
6.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 27, 2025 · F-0806 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Why it matters: Ignoring allergies can be dangerous, and ignoring preferences leads residents to eat less and lose weight.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 5, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 11, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Dec 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202460D
2025112J ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $31,360.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 5, 2025Fine$14,015
Feb 27, 2025Fine$17,345

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.224.833.95top 7% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.541.220.69top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.534.273.50top 6% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.700.690.48top 2% in Minnesota; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.442.245.8top 43% in Minnesota; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.238.642.9bottom 42% in Minnesota; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.35, RN 2.19, weekend 4.75. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Anderson, BrettIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/05/2024
Bell, BrittanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Carlson-Weinberg, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2019
Chebli, YasserIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Chebli, YasserIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Digiacomo, NicolettaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Digiacomo, NicolettaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Ebenezer Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Ebenezer Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Faust, KimIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Hereford, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2017
Jacobson, CarolynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Kvenvold, GayleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2024
Landreville, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2024
Milius, MargaretIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2024
Piper, KennethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2022
Walker, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2022
Willett, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2016
Wordelman, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/24/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Capital View Transitional Care Center0.5 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★★5/5
Little Sisters of the Poor0.6 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Villas at St Paul0.7 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC0.9 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cerenity Care Center on Humboldt1.5 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC2.1 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★☆3/5
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East2.8 miSaint Paul, MN★★★★☆3/5
Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II3.4 miWest Saint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Lyngblomsten Care Center3.6 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood3.6 miSaint Paul, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Hayes Residence3.7 miSaint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota3.9 miSaint Paul, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Paul →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245587.