How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center
13820 Community Drive, Burnsville, MN 55337 (opens Google Maps) · Dakota County · (952) 898-8400· 114 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 29, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 29, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 29, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 29, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| May 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| May 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.17
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.93
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.70
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.17 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 33% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.93 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 6% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.70 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 25% in Minnesota; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.52 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 3% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 42.2 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 38.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.17, RN 1.92, weekend 4.70.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebenezer Society | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/1976 |
| Anderson, Brett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/2024 |
| Anderson, Brett | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Bell, Brittany | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/06/2021 |
| Bires, Jackson | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2024 |
| Bires, Jackson | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2025 |
| Carlson-Weinberg, Susan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2019 |
| Carlson-Weinberg, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2019 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2025 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1976 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2025 |
| Faust, Kim | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2021 |
| Faust, Kim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2021 |
| Hereford, James | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Hereford, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Jacobson, Carolyn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Jacobson, Carolyn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Kvenvold, Gayle | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2024 |
| Kvenvold, Gayle | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2024 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ebenezer Senior Living — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Jones Harrison Residence — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Martin Luther Care Center — Bloomington, MN · overall 2/5
- Meadows on Fairview — Wyoming, MN · overall 4/5
- Aurora on France — Edina, MN · overall 4/5
- Ebenezer Integrated Care & Rehab — Saint Paul, MN · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 78 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Valley Village Health Care Center | 3.2 mi | Apple Valley, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center | 4.8 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Martin Luther Care Center | 4.9 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington | 5.2 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Estates at Bloomington LLC | 5.8 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Villas at Richfield | 7.6 mi | Richfield, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Friendship Village of Bloomington | 9.1 mi | Bloomington, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aurora on France | 9.6 mi | Edina, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Edina | 9.8 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount Olivet Careview Home | 10.4 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mount Olivet Home | 10.4 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Flagstone | 10.5 mi | Eden Prairie, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Dakota, MN — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Good Samaritan Society - Inver Grove Heights — Inver Grove Heights, MN · overall 3/5
- Regina Senior Living — Hastings, MN · overall 2/5
- Southview Acres Healthcare Center — West Saint Paul, MN · overall 2/5
- Trinity Care Center — Farmington, MN · overall 5/5
- Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II — West Saint Paul, MN · overall 2/5
- Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center — Inver Grove Heights, MN · overall 2/5
- Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation — Hastings, MN · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245213.