Arizona ›Scottsdale

Advance Health Care of Scottsdale

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

9846 North 95th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (480) 214-4200· 38 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since May 7, 2007 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified

Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ADVANCED HEALTH CARE (26 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 27, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842

View all 9 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Mar 27, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Oct 5, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Oct 5, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220D
202330E
202540E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.99
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.01
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.32
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.993.973.95top 35% in Arizona; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.010.690.69top 15% in Arizona; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.323.503.50top 41% in Arizona; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.860.490.48top 10% in Arizona; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.345.245.8top 48% in Arizona; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.243.642.9bottom 46% in Arizona; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.98, RN 1.25, weekend 4.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Advance Health Care of Scottsdale. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
New Ahc Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2021
The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
The G&H Miller Utah Trust Dated February 26, 2019OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
The Gail Miller GST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest72%01/01/2024
LHMSH LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
New Ahc Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Newcomb, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Oxnam, NathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Romer, CherylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Romer, CherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
S&S Nutrition Network INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Advanced Health Care — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 56 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Life Care Center of Scottsdale0.6 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★4/5
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center0.8 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Sante of North Scottsdale4.7 miScottsdale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Phoenix Mountain Post Acute6.2 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Arizona State Veteran Home-Phx6.3 miPhoenix, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale6.6 miScottsdale, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation6.6 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Haven of Scottsdale6.7 miScottsdale, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community6.8 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square7.4 miScottsdale, AZ—/5abuseSFF
Plaza Healthcare7.8 miScottsdale, AZ★★★★★5/5
Ridgecrest Post Acute8.1 miPhoenix, AZ★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Scottsdale →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035268.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details