How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Az - Rio Vista Post Acute and Rehabilitation
10323 West Olive Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (623) 875-0100· 150 certified beds · avg 140 residents/day · certified since Aug 5, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 4, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 4, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 4, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 4, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 15, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint F-0695
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint F-0561
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Apr 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint · F-0660 |
| May 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Mar 4, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Mar 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.72
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.66
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.27
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.72 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 49% in Arizona; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 36% in Arizona; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.27 | 3.50 | 3.50 | top 49% in Arizona; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.9 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 37% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 39% in Arizona; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.62, weekend 3.06.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Az - Rio Vista Post Acute and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2019 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2019 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Majors, Megan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2021 |
| Majors, Megan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2021 |
| Majors, Megan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2025 |
| Nassour, William | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2020 |
| Nassour, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2020 |
| Nassour, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2020 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2012 |
| The Ensign Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| West Olive Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center — Glendale, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Camelback Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5
- Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Tucson, AZ · overall 4/5
- Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Chandler, AZ · overall 4/5
- Citadel Post Acute — Mesa, AZ · overall 5/5
- Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation — Mesa, AZ · overall 3/5
- Coronado Healthcare Center — Phoenix, AZ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 42 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immanuel Campus of Care | 0.8 mi | Peoria, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Youngtown, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Boswell Transitional Care of Cascadia | 2.7 mi | Sun City, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Peoria Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Peoria, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Freedom Plaza Care Center | 3.1 mi | Peoria, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Agave Grove Post Acute | 4.6 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Sun Health la Loma Care Center | 6.0 mi | Litchfield Park, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Diamondback Healthcare Center | 6.0 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sun City Post Acute | 6.0 mi | Sun City, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Center at Arrowhead, LLC | 6.2 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of North Glendale | 6.4 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Glendale | 6.8 mi | Glendale, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Beatitudes Campus — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5
- Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center — Glendale, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Camelback Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5
- Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Chandler, AZ · overall 4/5
- Christian Care Nursing Center — Phoenix, AZ · overall 4/5
- Citadel Post Acute — Mesa, AZ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035183.