Kansas ›Olathe

Aberdeen Village

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

17500 W 119th Street, Olathe, KS 66061 (opens Google Maps) · Johnson County · (913) 599-6100· 60 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 10, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 22, 2024
$8,021
Fines, last 3 years
4.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 22, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint F-0744

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756

View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 20, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Oct 22, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
May 15, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812
May 15, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
May 15, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint · F-0676
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
May 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint · F-0700
Sep 27, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Sep 27, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
2024101J ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $8,021, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 22, 2024Fine$8,021
Oct 22, 2024Payment Denial15 days from Nov 14, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.91
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.20
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.59
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.914.583.95top 33% in Kansas; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.200.810.69top 15% in Kansas; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.594.053.50top 27% in Kansas; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.490.48top 5% in Kansas; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.748.145.8top 20% in Kansas; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.442.042.9top 22% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.17, RN 1.26, weekend 4.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Aberdeen Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Presbyterian Manors INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2015
Allin, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2007
Allin, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Bonney, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Brennecke, GaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Cook, PatriciaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Duling, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Eapen, JeenaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2024
Eapen, JeenaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Farmer, CarlaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Goodwin, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Harris, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Hind, SherryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1989
Miller, JoanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/1997
Owens, MelanieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2017
Owens, MelanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2017
Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2001
Schendel, RobIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2023
Shogren, BruceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/05/1996
Shogren, BruceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2011

Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
  • "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
  • "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 65 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center INC1.1 miOlathe, KS★★★★★3/5
The Plaza Health Services at Santa Marta2.4 miOlathe, KS★★★★★4/5
Nottingham Health and Rehabilitation3.0 miOlathe, KS★★★★★5/5
Azria Health Olathe3.5 miOlathe, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care Center3.6 miOverland Park, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Delmar Gardens of Overland Park3.7 miOverland Park, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Colonial Village3.7 miOverland Park, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Lakeview Village4.2 miLenexa, KS★★★★☆3/5
Delmar Gardens of Lenexa4.3 miLenexa, KS★★★★☆4/5
Good Samaritan-Olathe4.4 miOlathe, KS★★★☆☆2/5
The Healthcare Resort of Olathe4.6 miOlathe, KS★★☆☆☆1/5
Hoeger House4.7 miOlathe, KS★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Johnson, KS — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Olathe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175448.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details