KansasDodge City

Manor of the Plains

200 Campus Drive, Dodge City, KS 67801 · Ford County · 50 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1994

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 16, 2021 · F-0803

The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Why it matters: When menus aren't planned and followed properly, residents may not get the nutrition their health depends on.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 12, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Sep 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 11, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 16, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 16, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202151J ▲
202350D
2025100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.534.583.95top 48% in Kansas; top 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.040.810.69top 22% in Kansas; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.174.053.50top 39% in Kansas; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.490.48top 25% in Kansas; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.948.145.8bottom 38% in Kansas; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.542.042.9bottom 21% in Kansas; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.82, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Presbyterian Manors INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/30/1989
Brennecke, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Cook, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2012
Cumberland, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Harris, DanielIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2006
Hind, SherryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1989
Korbe, JerryIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2012
McKell, ElizabethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2012
Miller, JoanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/1997
Morrison, AaronIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Nelson, EleanorIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2010
Ott, RayIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2010
Owens, MelanieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2017
Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2010
Shogren, BruceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/05/1996
Taylor, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Wedel, RandyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Trinity Manor0.7 miDodge City, KS★★★★☆4/5
Kansas Soldiers Home1.3 miFort Dodge, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Sunporch of Dodge City2.9 miDodge City, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Southwind at Spearville14.9 miSpearville, KS★★★★☆3/5
The Shepherd's Center18.8 miCimarron, KS★★☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Dodge City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175306.