How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
16600 W. 126th St, Olathe, KS 66062 (opens Google Maps) · Johnson County · (913) 829-5201· 170 certified beds · avg 136 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| May 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| May 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Sep 27, 2021 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.82 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 12% in Kansas; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.69 | top 44% in Kansas; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.29 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 12% in Kansas; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Kansas; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.9 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 5% in Kansas; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | top 24% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.64, RN 0.73, weekend 5.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allin, Jill | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2024 |
| Allin, Jill | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2024 |
| Anthony, Nicole | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Anthony, Nicole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Anthony, Nicole | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2021 |
| Benning, JD | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Bibler, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Bregant, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2022 |
| Heidrick, Bradley | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2023 |
| Heidrick, Bradley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2023 |
| Heidrick, Bradley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2023 |
| McKinzie, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Northeast Kansas Catholic Healthcare Services INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Northeast Kansas Catholic Healthcare Services INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Parise, Brett | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Pennings, Gary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2009 |
| Scott, Jillian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Villa St. Francis Real Estate Holdings, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2021 |
| Villa St. Francis Real Estate Holdings, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aberdeen Village | 1.1 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Nottingham Health and Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Plaza Health Services at Santa Marta | 2.1 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Colonial Village | 2.7 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care Center | 2.9 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Azria Health Olathe | 3.1 mi | Olathe, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Delmar Gardens of Overland Park | 3.5 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Good Samaritan-Olathe | 4.0 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hoeger House | 4.3 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Healthcare Resort of Olathe | 4.3 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Lenexa | 4.4 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lakeview Village | 4.7 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Johnson, KS — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175115.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details