KansasShawnee

Brookdale Rosehill

12802 Johnson Drive, Shawnee, KS 66216 · Johnson County · 92 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jun 30, 2004

Part of chain: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 19, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (23 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260D
2023230F
202420D
202550F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.244.583.95bottom 41% in Kansas; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.370.810.69top 8% in Kansas; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.934.053.50top 49% in Kansas; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.190.490.48top 1% in Kansas; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.048.145.8top 30% in Kansas; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.442.042.9bottom 46% in Kansas; top 50% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 1.28, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
American Retirement CorporationOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2006
Kussow, DawnIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025
White, ChadwickIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025
Ally BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2024
Ally Financial INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2025
Arc Sweet Life Rosehill LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2006
Ib Finance Holding Company LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2025
Kalender-Rich, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Kalender-Rich, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2025
Kussow, DawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
La Marre, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2024
La Marre, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2017
La Marre, KevinIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2025
LBMC PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Munoz, AnnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2024
Patchett, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2018
Pu, BrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Pu, BrettIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2025
Puhler, JustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Stengle, NikolasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sharon Lane Health and Rehabilitation1.6 miShawnee, KS★★★★★4/5
Merriam Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center1.9 miMerriam, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Shawnee Gardens Healthcare & Rehab Center2.0 miShawnee, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Garden Terrace at Overland Park3.0 miOverland Park, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Westchester Village of Lenexa3.3 miLenexa, KS★★★★☆4/5
Shawnee Post Acute Rehabilitation Center3.4 miOverland Park, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Lakeview Village4.2 miLenexa, KS★★★★☆3/5
Aspen Health and Wellness4.4 miOverland Park, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Delmar Gardens of Lenexa4.9 miLenexa, KS★★★★☆4/5
Kaw River Care and Rehab5.0 miEdwardsville, KS★☆☆☆☆2/5
Parkway Operator LLC5.0 miEdwardsville, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Edwardsville Care and Rehab5.0 miEdwardsville, KS★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Shawnee →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175478.