Newton Presbyterian Manor

Name: Newton Presbyterian Manor
Address: 1200 E 7TH STREET, Newton, KS, 67114, US
Telephone: 3162835400

1200 E 7th Street, Newton, KS 67114 · Harvey County · 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1994

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$26,500

Fines, last 3 years

4.83

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 25, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 25, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 25, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 25, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 25, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 25, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 25, 2026	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Feb 25, 2026	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 18, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Aug 25, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 25, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 25, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 25, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 25, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 25, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	6	0	E
2024	4	1	G ▲
2026	11	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $26,500.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Feb 25, 2026	Fine	$26,500

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Kansas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.83	4.58	3.95	top 37% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.80	0.81	0.69	top 39% in Kansas; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.38	4.05	3.50	top 33% in Kansas; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.39	0.49	0.48	bottom 39% in Kansas; top 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	65.4	48.1	45.8	bottom 13% in Kansas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	83.3	42.0	42.9	bottom 8% in Kansas; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.64, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Presbyterian Manors INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/30/1989
Bonney, Robert	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2019
Brennecke, Gary	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Cook, Patricia	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2022
Duling, Nancy	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Farmer, Carla	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2025
Goodwin, John	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2018
Harris, Daniel	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2019
Hind, Sherry	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/1989
Liepins, Richard	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2024
Liepins, Richard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Miller, Joan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/1997
Owens, Melanie	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/10/2017
Owens, Melanie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/10/2017
Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/1989
Schendel, Rob	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	11/15/2023
Shogren, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/05/1996
Shogren, Bruce	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2011
Taylor, William	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Taylor, William	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Kansas Christian Home	0.7 mi	Newton, KS	★★★☆☆	3/5
Paramount Community Living and Rehab INC	2.0 mi	Newton, KS	★★★☆☆	3/5
Bethel Health Care Center	2.3 mi	North Newton, KS	★★★★★	5/5
Schowalter Villa	8.0 mi	Hesston, KS	★★★★★	5/5
Halstead Health and Rehabilitation Center	10.3 mi	Halstead, KS	★★★★★	3/5
Wheat State Manor	11.6 mi	Whitewater, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Diversicare of Sedgwick	12.5 mi	Sedgwick, KS	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Bethesda Home	13.5 mi	Goessel, KS	★★★★★	5/5
Access Mental Health	14.0 mi	Peabody, KS		—/5	SFF
Peabody Health and Rehab	14.1 mi	Peabody, KS	★★★★☆	4/5
Pine Village	14.1 mi	Moundridge, KS	★★★☆☆	4/5
Moundridge Manor	15.1 mi	Moundridge, KS	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Newton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175302.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Newton Presbyterian Manor

1200 E 7th Street, Newton, KS 67114 · 3162835400

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $26,500

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Feb 25, 2026 (F-0686, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Feb 25, 2026 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Dec 18, 2024 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 175302 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)