How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Plaza Health Services at Santa Marta
13875 W 115th Terrace, Olathe, KS 66062 (opens Google Maps) · Johnson County · (913) 906-0990· 50 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Aug 8, 2008 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 14, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 31, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 31, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 31, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| May 14, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint · F-0582 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint · F-0625 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint · F-0700 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint · F-0849 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · from a complaint · F-0883 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint · F-0620 |
| Oct 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 14 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.90
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.82
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.46
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.90 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 11% in Kansas; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.69 | top 38% in Kansas; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.46 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 10% in Kansas; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Kansas; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 48.1 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 42.0 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.31, RN 0.74, weekend 4.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Plaza Health Services at Santa Marta. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahlvers, Carol | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Andrews, Mark | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/25/2004 |
| Baron, Regan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Blecha, Debra | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Bolig, Jeff | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Eldridge, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Erkmann, Catherine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Fogel, Larry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Friel, Michelle | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Grams, Jon | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Greystone Management Services Company LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2008 |
| Haase, Brian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Hawken, Mike | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Jacobson, Dan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Lanahan, Michael | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/25/2004 |
| McKean, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Moorman, Doug | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| O'Toole, Peggy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Payne, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Schmidt, Andrew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 76 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delmar Gardens of Overland Park | 1.4 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care Center | 1.6 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center INC | 2.1 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Aberdeen Village | 2.4 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Lenexa | 2.4 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Nottingham Health and Rehabilitation | 2.4 mi | Olathe, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Colonial Village | 2.7 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lakeview Village | 3.0 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Westchester Village of Lenexa | 3.8 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brookdale Overland Park | 4.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Swan Health at Overland Park | 4.9 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Garden Terrace at Overland Park | 5.0 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Johnson, KS — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Village at Mission — Prairie Village, KS · overall 2/5
- Village Shalom INC — Overland Park, KS · overall 4/5
- Advanced Health Care of Overland Park — Overland Park, KS · overall 5/5
- Aspen Health and Wellness — Overland Park, KS · overall 1/5
- Azria Health Olathe — Olathe, KS · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175503.