How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1000 St Luke Drive, Nashville, TN 37205 (opens Google Maps) · Davidson County · (615) 352-3430· 120 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jul 17, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION (69 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. F-0585
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.91 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Tennessee; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.69 | top 20% in Tennessee; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.56 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 15% in Tennessee; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.95 | 0.39 | 0.48 | top 3% in Tennessee; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 62.6 | 48.9 | 45.8 | bottom 14% in Tennessee; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 51.6 | 43.2 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in Tennessee; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.99, weekend 3.50.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for West Meade Place. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Group INC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2020 |
| Barbara J Friedbauer Rev Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 45% | 10/26/2015 |
| Friedbauer, Elise | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 45% | 05/18/2000 |
| Friedbaurer, John | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/18/2000 |
| Warren, Nancy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/18/2000 |
| Alexandra Group INC | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2020 |
| Friedbauer, Elise | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2020 |
| Friedbaurer, John | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2020 |
| Friedbaurer, Rober | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/1987 |
| Friedbaurer, Rober | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/1987 |
| Mary Queen of Angels INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2002 |
| Rehman, Faiza | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Rehman, Faiza | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Shelly, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Shelly, Timothy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Shelly, Timothy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Tennessee Healthcare Advisors, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Tennessee Healthcare Advisors, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Vincent, Brandon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/19/2024 |
| Vincent, Brandon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/19/2024 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain National Healthcare Corporation — 69 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 68 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodcrest at Blakeford | 3.9 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 4.0 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Meadows | 4.7 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Health Center at Richland Place | 4.9 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| NHC Place at the Trace | 5.6 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL | 6.8 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Nashville | 6.9 mi | Nashville, TN | —/5 | ||
| Somerfield at the Heritage | 8.1 mi | Brentwood, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Eaton Creek Post Acute | 8.3 mi | Nashville, TN | —/5 | SFF | |
| Trevecca Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC | 8.7 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC | 10.0 mi | Nashville, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| NHC Place at Cool Springs | 10.7 mi | Franklin, TN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Davidson, TN — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445203.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details